tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-398420085248706856.post1507603308355178974..comments2023-06-21T21:47:08.586+08:00Comments on hoamon's sandbox: 「政治文」:我有一個夢,希望大家分得出本質與表象。hoamonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03979063804278011312noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-398420085248706856.post-5578715331146625972009-12-06T14:19:30.221+08:002009-12-06T14:19:30.221+08:00To gong-yi liao:
我在「政治文」:證交稅打折?裡,也有提到『馬上好』是句屁話,相信的...To gong-yi liao:<br />我在<a href="http://hoamon.blogspot.com/2008/09/blog-post.html" rel="nofollow">「政治文」:證交稅打折?</a>裡,也有提到『馬上好』是句屁話,相信的人不是麻痹自己的理智,就是本來沒理智的。<br /><br />投票的重點,我認為:『不是你投給誰,而是判斷的標準是什麼』hoamonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03979063804278011312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-398420085248706856.post-27142553562739281332009-12-06T14:14:26.591+08:002009-12-06T14:14:26.591+08:00to gong-yi liao:
你要提醒我, 2008 年我投的是馬蕭陣營嗎? 是的! 我的確投的...to gong-yi liao:<br />你要提醒我, 2008 年我投的是馬蕭陣營嗎? 是的! 我的確投的是他們,在那篇文章裡有寫我投票的原因。<br /><br />但本文的主旨是『如果因為看了一個廣告或是某個標語(如: 馬上好)』,就認定應該投票給誰的呀! 那就是表象、本質不分的選民。hoamonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03979063804278011312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-398420085248706856.post-74755542715376071352009-12-06T10:20:27.624+08:002009-12-06T10:20:27.624+08:00嗯。
http://hoamon.blogspot.com/2007/12/2008_22.htm...嗯。<br /><br />http://hoamon.blogspot.com/2007/12/2008_22.htmlGong-Yi Liaohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11302878591097519896noreply@blogger.com